Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
return
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home / Expertise Search / Brennan, Jean
380 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type
























New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
File Octet Stream Issue - Invasives - DOI-NEPA
Themes outlined in the report reflect a sample of key points described in bureau submissions; this is not an exhaustive list. Specific details are included in the submissions provided by each bureau and office that responded to the questionnaire. Applicability NEPA analysis can apply to 1) actions for which prevention/control of invasive species is the primary purpose of the action, and 2) actions for which the purpose of the action is to execute program or projects, such as operations, maintenance or construction activities, during which invasive species prevention/control may not be the primary purpose but invasive species risks should be considered and minimized. Challenges to NEPA Compliance Lack of training in NEPA compliance and access to technical support; Limitations of data availability / data accessibility (e.g., site specific information, distribution and life history information, impacts, control techniques); Reductions in funding and staffing; and, o Insufficient policy and guidance to the field. Solutions to Overcome Challenges Provide additional training and guidance to appropriate staff on NEPA compliance; Support research for new methods of controls/eradication that are effective, efficient, and less damaging to non-target habitats/species; Improve methods of data sharing and make information centrally accessible; Promote coordination with other agencies; Update policy, guidance, and templates, including best management practices (BMPS) for the type of activities conducted; ensure that those BMPS can be used by all agencies; Develop Agency-wide / Regional / Large-scale plans and guidance (e.g., Programmatic EA, Programmatic EIS) from which EAs/EISs for projects can be tiered; and, Develop more options for categorical exclusion that benefit the environment (esp. for early detection and rapid response (EDRR) and control). There are others, but these are the highlights included in the report.
Located in LP Members / / ACP State of the Appalachians WG / Freshwater Systems
File text/texmacs Issue - Climate Impacts
The Southeastern United States and U.S. Caribbean is highly vulnerable to a variety of climatic factors and extreme weather events, including heavy downpours, floods, and droughts, all of which can influence water resources in this region. Over the last 30 years, the Southeast has been affected by more billion-dollar weather-related disasters than any other region, with coastal states experiencing more hurricanes, and inland states experiencing ice storms and tornadoes. Decision makers are faced with the challenge of developing and implementing management options to help people prepare for, respond to, and recover from the unavoidable effects of climate change (also known as adaptation). EcoAdapt is pleased to announce the release of The State of Climate Adaptation in Water Resources Management: Southeastern United States and U.S. Caribbean. This synthesis report provides: A summary of key regional climate change impacts and discussion on how the aforementioned issues combine to influence water supply, demand and use, quality, and delivery; The results of a survey sent to federal, tribal, state, and other practitioners to identify challenges, needs, and opportunities for climate-informed water resources management; Examples of adaptation initiatives from the region, focusing on activities in the natural and built environments as they relate to water resources; Eighteen full-length case studies, detailing how adaptation is taking shape; and A guide to the current suite of tools available to support adaptation action in water resources management, planning, and conservation. The synthesis report, case studies, and tools guide provide useful information on climate change adaptation in the Southeastern United States and U.S. Caribbean for both novice and experienced practitioners within or beyond the region’s borders to apply to their own work. Readers can learn about different types of adaptation strategies, find real-world examples of how others in similar disciplines or regions are incorporating climate change into their work, and locate the people and tools needed to help move their adaptation efforts forward. Funding for this project was provided by the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, Curtis & Edith Munson Foundation, and the Climate Adaptation Knowledge Exchange (CAKE). To learn more about the State of Adaptation Program and this project, visit www.EcoAdapt.org/programs or contact Rachel M. Gregg at Rachel@EcoAdapt.org. To join the CAKE community and learn more about climate adaptation, visit www.CAKEx.org.
Located in LP Members / / ACP State of the Appalachians WG / Freshwater Systems
Goals for Stakeholder Engagement in Focal Landscape
The Appalachian LCC is engaging in an integrated, multi-scale conservation planning and design initiative throughout its geography. Phase I of this research identified five different conservation design elements. The largest element is made up of regionally connected cores. These cores are broad areas of regional significance (i.e., irreplaceability) that have high internal landscape connectivity. The LCC has strategically decided to target two of these core areas as part of its ongoing effort in Phase II of this process to reach out and collaborate with local partners working in these cores. These two areas include the Tennessee River Basin and western Pennsylvania.
Located in Science & Management
File C++ source code 2011 Approved Interim Governance/Charter of the AppLCC
This guiding document was drafted with the help of Interim Steering Committee Members, Partners, and AppLCC Staff. The Charter was approved as "Interim" with the provision that it must be revised and finalized no later than 2-years after approval date (Sept 2011.)
Located in Cooperative / / SC Meeting & Workshop, April 22-24, 2013 / SC Governance Work Group
File Quick Reference Guide - on the ISC Governance/Charter
This is a 'snap shot' of key requirements from the Interim Governance/Charter as approved by the Interim Steering Committee in 2011. It was prepared primarily to answer Administrative issues that may arise during Steering Committee meetings and calls.
Located in Cooperative / / SC Meeting & Workshop, April 22-24, 2013 / SC Governance Work Group
File Section B, Goal 4 - 5-Year Work Plan
Goal 4 focuses mainly on the role of the Steering Committee to help advance the Work Plan. "Goal 4: Assess and align conservation goals and actions that reflect our cooperative members’ common and shared vision"
Located in Cooperative / / SC Meeting & Workshop, April 22-24, 2013 / SC Programmatic Alignment Work Group
File text/texmacs LCC Member Organizations - Vision & Mission Statements
From Steering Committee Membership representation. File distributed to ISC members at the July 2012 (Work Plan) Workshop.
Located in Cooperative / / SC Meeting & Workshop, April 22-24, 2013 / SC Programmatic Alignment Work Group
File Troff document 2011 State of the Birds Report
2011 State of the Birds Report. Note importance of Grassland Bird Conservation.
Located in Cooperative / / SC Programmatic Alignment Work Group / National-level Programs and Initiatives
State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs)
An Agenda for Conservation Success in Every State: In order to receive funds through the Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program and the State Wildlife Grants Program, Congress charged each state and territory with developing a wildlife action plan. These proactive plans, known technically as “comprehensive wildlife conservation strategies,” assess the health of each state’s wildlife and habitats, identify the problems they face, and outline the actions that are needed to conserve them over the long term. All 50 States and five U.S. territories developed a State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP) in 2005. State Wildlife Action Plans outline the steps that are needed to conserve wildlife and habitat before they become too rare or costly to restore. Taken as a whole, they present a national action agenda for preventing wildlife from becoming endangered.
Located in Cooperative / / SC Programmatic Alignment Work Group / State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs)
File AppLCC 5-Year Work Plan - Goal 3
Goal 3 focuses on broad Engagement of which Communications is an element. "Goal 3: Create an on-going facilitated process to promote engagement and dialogue across the Appalachian LCC region"
Located in Cooperative / / SC Meeting & Workshop, April 22-24, 2013 / SC Communications Work Group