Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
return
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home / News & Events / Pricing the Priceless: Ecosystem Services Science at USGS

Pricing the Priceless: Ecosystem Services Science at USGS

Nature's products and services are essential not only to the ecosystems that provide them, but also to the people and societies built on them. Factoring their value into cost-benefit analyses is an important part of smart planning. But that raises a new question—how to assign value to ecosystem services?
Pricing the Priceless: Ecosystem Services Science at USGS

Soper Branch stream with a USGS streamgage on the bridge. Soper Branch is a small stream near Hyattstown, MD, that is part of the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Nearly on the doorstep of the District of Columbia can be found a series of floodplains, areas of land near a stream or river that may be inundated when the river rises. These lands are the focus of USGS scientist Dianna Hogan’s research, but, unlike traditional ecological research, she isn’t just looking at the relationships between living things and their environment. She’s also trying to determine the value of the goods and services they produce.

The streams and floodplains surrounding the Nation’s capital may seem an odd place to hear the language of Wall Street, but they’re actually a perfect example of the field of research known as ecosystem services. This discipline marries the social science of economics with the environmental sciences in order to determine the value of products and services that ecosystems provide people.

As Hogan’s research is showing, the streams and floodplains of the Chesapeake Bay perform important jobs for both the wildlife and human communities that live in the area. Floodplains in particular are very good at cleaning stormwater runoff of sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen, all three of which contribute to the environmental issues that have been plaguing the seafood industry of the Chesapeake Bay. In addition, these floodplains are effective at cleaning drinking water for the towns that rely on it. These services are important for the Chesapeake Bay watershed, and are provided naturally by the floodplain ecosystems.

Nature, Inc.

So what other kinds of products and services do ecosystems provide people? There are obvious ones, such as wild fish and game for food, minerals like rare earth elements and copper, fuels like oil and gas, and fresh water for agriculture and drinking. But there are less apparent, yet still extremely important services that ecosystems provide humanity.

Coastal wetlands, for example, often serve as shock absorbers for storm surge created when ocean storms come ashore. Pollinators, such as bees –both native and honeybees –and bats, perform the lion’s share of pollinating fruit trees and other agricultural crops. River deltas like Louisiana’s Atchafalaya Basin provide essential habitat for the seafood that underpins billion-dollar industries.

These products and services are essential not only to the ecosystems that provide them, but also to the people and societies built on them. Factoring their value into cost-benefit analyses is an important part of smart planning. But that raises a new question—how to assign value to ecosystem services?

Putting Prices on the Priceless

More than a thousand miles away from Dianna Hogan’s floodplains lie a series of wetlands called the Prairie Pothole region. This area covers parts of Iowa, Minnesota, the Dakotas, and Montana, as well as the Canadian provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta. The region is filled with shallow depressions that fill with water in the spring, and are a vital habitat for migratory birds.

The Prairie Pothole region is also important for several human activities as well, including agriculture and, recently, oil and gas development in the Bakken Formation of North Dakota and Montana. These activities impact the Prairie Pothole ecosystemsand their ability to provide their original services.

Since the products of agriculture and energy development include commodities that are priced according to established markets, determining their value is fairly simple. But to look at the full picture of the decision to convert native prairie into either oil and gas production or agriculture, the value of the services the prairie provides must be accounted for as well.

That’s where ecosystem services science comes in.


 

Several years ago, USGS scientists, led by Billy Gascoigne, conducted a study in which they identified the primary services provided by the Prairie Potholes, assigned values based on economics, and then applied those values to the services these potholes provide across the region. In this case, the services identified were carbon sequestration, prevention of erosion, and migratory bird habitat.

Using the values calculated, the scientists determined that converting 10 percent of existing Prairie Pothole land into cropland would result in a net loss of $3.4 billion in ecosystem services due to the reduced ability of the prairie to perform the three services studied. This reduction includes the commodity value of the crops that would replace the prairie.

Studies like this one show how important it is to assign values to the products and services provided by the environment. Without a price to compare to the commodities, land and resource managers run the risk of making inefficient and costly mistakes.

Bats and Bugs—the Billion Dollar Relationship

It’s not just habitats or regions that have services that can be valued. Individual animals also fit into the science of ecosystem services. Bats, for instance, are commonly thought of as something to fear. But farmers have every reason to fear nothaving bats, because they provide a very important service, and they do it for free—they eat insects. Lots and lots of insects.

USGS scientists and partners analyzed the value of bats eating insects to farmers, and they found that bats eat so many insects that they likely save the U.S. agricultural industry at least $3.7 billion annually. That’s money that farmers would otherwise have to spend on chemical insecticides.

This study helps explain why policymakers should care about the disease spreading throughout North American bats called white-nose syndrome. It has killed more than 1 million bats since it arrived in the United States in 2006, which means anywhere from 660 to 1320 metric tons of insects are no longer being eaten. Such a severe decline in bats could have significant impacts on the agricultural industry.

Insect-eating Brazilian Free-Tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) provide a great pest-control service to agriculture and natural ecosystems.

Start with Science

Back in the Chesapeake Bay area, Hogan plans to continue her research into the ecosystem services that floodplains provide local communities. By incorporating the real value of the goods and services that area ecosystems provide, land and resource managers, town and city councils, and industries can make informed decisions about how to maximize the benefits of the environments they live and work in.

Filed under: Water, News, Aquatic, Economy